Jet’s Chapter 7 bankruptcy marks one of the most closely watched failures in modern private aviation, with significant implications for the private jet and fractional ownership market. This article is intended for fractional jet owners, prospective buyers, and anyone interested in private aviation. It covers the timeline of Jet's bankruptcy, the causes, the impact on stakeholders, and key lessons for the industry.
Jet It, founded in 2018 by Honda Aircraft alumni Glenn Gonzales and Vishal Hiremath, launched with a HondaJet fractional program. The company’s core business model allowed customers to purchase a share, granting them a set number of days to use the aircraft, offering lower costs than traditional fractional-share programs. This approach, known as fractional jet ownership, enables individuals or businesses to buy a portion of a private jet and access it for a predetermined number of days each year.
For fractional owners and prospective buyers, the Jet It bankruptcy is more than a headline—it is a case study in financial structure, operational risk, and why due diligence matters when choosing a private aviation partner. Jet aimed to provide lower costs than traditional fractional-share programs through its innovative fractional program, marketing rates of $1,600 per hour for its fractional ownership program.
This article provides a comprehensive, fact-based breakdown of the Jet It Chapter 7 bankruptcy timeline, creditor claims, the Honda Aircraft dispute, and the lessons for anyone evaluating fractional aircraft ownership today, especially for those considering fractional jet ownership financing.
Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Filing
Timeline of Events
Jet It formally filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection on December 24, 2025, in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, after having shut down operations in May 2023. The filing immediately placed the company into liquidation rather than reorganization, signaling that Jet It had ceased operations and had no viable path forward as a going concern.
The court appointed a Chapter 7 trustee to oversee the liquidation process, marshal assets, and administer creditor claims. Under Chapter 7, Jet’s remaining assets are to be sold and distributed according to statutory priority rules.
Administrative Expenses and Creditor Impact
The bankruptcy filing indicated that after administrative expenses are paid, no funds will be available to unsecured creditors. Jet had over 200 unsecured creditors listed in its bankruptcy filing.
With the bankruptcy process underway, attention turned to the company's creditors and the scale of outstanding claims.
Jet It Creditors And Major Claims
Major Creditors
The creditor list in the Jet It bankruptcy provides insight into the operational pressures facing the company prior to its collapse. Jet It relied on a wide range of business service providers for various services, including jet fuel, maintenance, software, insurance, storage, and off-fleet charter flights.
It had to absorb over $20 million in off-fleet expenses to fulfill fractional owner flight demand, which further strained its financial resources and liquidity and highlighted weaknesses in understanding the total cost of fractional jet ownership.
Largest Unsecured Creditors
Among the largest unsecured creditors were:
Fuel providers collectively owed several million dollars across multiple airports and fuel vendors
Jetex Flight Services (aviation services provider) owed for fuel provision, aircraft maintenance, and operational support
Carolina GSE (an aviation ground support equipment provider based in South Carolina) owed for equipment and tooling
Rocket Fuel Labs (public relations and marketing vendor) owed for PR and marketing services
The Dixie Building, LLC (facility creditor), is involved in financial disputes related to property use
Maintenance and repair organizations (MROs), with unpaid balances for scheduled and unscheduled work
Charter operators used to cover Jet It flights when owned aircraft were unavailable
American Express owed over $600,000, according to the bankruptcy filing
Fuel claims alone represented a significant portion of unsecured debt, underscoring how Jet It relied on post-flight invoicing to maintain liquidity.
Reported Liabilities And Unsecured Claims
Liabilities Overview
In its bankruptcy schedules, Jet It reported total liabilities exceeding $36.2 million, compared to assets estimated at under $10 million. The majority of claims were listed as unsecured, placing many vendors, service providers, and counterparties at significant risk of non-recovery. Jet It reported $1.16 million in assets at the time of its bankruptcy filing, including cash equivalents.
Unsecured Creditors
Unsecured creditors included:
Fuel providers
Maintenance facilities
Training organizations
Charter operators
Manufacturers
The scale of unsecured exposure reflects how deeply Jet It relied on trade credit to sustain day-to-day flight operations.
Maintenance And Training Claims
Maintenance Vendor Claims
Maintenance vendors reported substantial unpaid balances related to inspections, parts replacement, and deferred maintenance. Jet gained a reputation for being slow or delinquent on payments to maintenance providers, which delayed aircraft servicing and impacted operations.
Training Provider Claims
Embraer CAE Training Services and Berkshire Hathaway unit FlightSafety (FlightSafety International) were also listed as creditors for unpaid pilot training and aircraft maintenance services. Training provider FlightSafety was listed as an unsecured creditor for unpaid pilot training services, reflecting Jet’s growing difficulty in meeting recurrent training obligations.
Aircraft WiFi and Other Services
Claims also included unpaid invoices for aircraft WiFi services, which are essential for modern private jet operations.
With the creditor landscape established, the next major issue was Jet's relationship with Honda Aircraft and the resulting disputes.
Honda Aircraft Dispute
Contractual Relationship and Disputes
One of the most controversial aspects of the Jet It bankruptcy involves its deteriorating relationship with Honda Aircraft. Under Honda Aircraft's contract, Jet It was prohibited from selling aircraft for exclusive use outside of its fractional ownership program, which led to legal disputes between the two companies. Jet's model differed from traditional fractional share programs, which typically offer structured, long-term ownership shares with predictable costs, by providing more flexible arrangements.
Reliability and Operational Challenges
Reliability issues with the HondaJet were a major point of contention. HondaJet's lack of reliability and support contributed to significant operational challenges for Jet It, with over half of its fleet grounded at one point.
Alleged Breach-Of-Contract Claims
Jet It alleged that Honda Aircraft failed to meet contractual obligations related to aircraft reliability, parts availability, and support services. These claims surfaced prominently in court filings and communications with owners.
Jet It executives argued that recurring aircraft availability issues disrupted scheduled operations and forced increased reliance on off-fleet charter aircraft—significantly increasing operating costs. While safety concerns were cited as the official reason for grounding events and fleet issues, underlying financial issues and persistent cash flow problems also played a significant role in operational disruptions and a deterioration in customer service.
CEO Letter Criticizing Aircraft Reliability
In a widely circulated letter to owners prior to the bankruptcy, Jet’s CEO criticized what he described as persistent reliability challenges within the HondaJet fleet. The letter pointed to mechanical downtime and delays that allegedly undermined Jet’s ability to deliver contracted flight hours.
Service Contracts And EMC2 Claims
Jet. It also listed disputes tied to Honda service contracts and EMC2 engine maintenance program obligations. These claims suggest disagreements over maintenance cost coverage, reimbursement timing, and service scope—issues that became acute as Jet’s cash position deteriorated.
As the Honda Aircraft dispute unfolded, Jet’s operational challenges became more severe, leading to increased reliance on off-fleet charter operators.
Off-Fleet Charter Operators And Vendor Claims
Charter Operator Dependence
As Jet’s owned fleet became increasingly unavailable, the company relied heavily on off-fleet charter operators to fulfill owner trips. When Jet could not meet demand with its own fleet, it was often forced to source flights from the broader charter market, typically at higher per-hour rates. Jet It marketed its fractional ownership program at rates of $1,600 per hour, excluding additional fees.
Charter Provider Unpaid Totals
Numerous charter providers were listed as unsecured creditors, with individual claims ranging from tens of thousands to several hundred thousand dollars. Collectively, unpaid charter invoices represented a major liability category.
Charter costs are typically higher than internally operated flights, particularly when sourced on short notice. This dynamic placed further strain on Jet’s already fragile cash flow.
Maintenance Liens On Aircraft
Several maintenance shops asserted mechanic’s liens against aircraft for unpaid work. These liens complicate aircraft recovery efforts and can delay the release of logbooks and maintenance records—critical documents for owners asserting control over their assets.
With mounting vendor claims and operational disruptions, Jet’s asset base and financials came under scrutiny.
Assets And Financials
Total Assets And Cash On Hand
Bankruptcy filings showed less than $1 million in cash on hand at the time of filing. Remaining assets consisted primarily of receivables, refundable deposits, and limited physical inventory.
CARES Act Credits
Jet It listed remaining CARES Act aviation credits as assets, though the recoverable value of these credits remains uncertain and subject to eligibility review.
Ground Support And Tooling
Ground-support equipment, spare tools, and miscellaneous operational inventory were collectively valued at a modest level relative to total liabilities—insufficient to materially improve recoveries for unsecured creditors. Notably, Carolina GSE was a key creditor for aviation ground support equipment and tooling, highlighting its role as a service provider owed payment by Jet It.
With assets insufficient to cover liabilities, the focus shifted to ownership structure and secured interests.
Ownership And Secured Interests
LoJet And Secured Position
LoJet Holdings, LLC was listed as a secured creditor, holding a 44.3% ownership stake in Jet It and serving as the only secured creditor in the bankruptcy proceedings, placing it in a materially stronger recovery position than most vendors. LoJet held a secured interest tied to aircraft financing arrangements, positioning it ahead of unsecured creditors in the liquidation waterfall.
Founder And Investor Stakes
Jet’s founders retained minority ownership interests, alongside a group of smaller investors. Equity holders are last in priority under Chapter 7 and are unlikely to receive any recovery.
With the ownership and creditor hierarchy established, the next focus is on the direct impact to fractional owners and private jet clients, many of whom are now reassessing which fractional jet ownership programs best balance access, risk, and governance.
Impact On Fractional Owners And Private Jet Clients
Owner Liability Exposure
Fractional owners were among the most affected stakeholders. Many customers and employees were directly impacted by the company's collapse. In particular, many fractional owners were left responsible for unpaid expenses related to their aircraft, including maintenance and storage fees.
In many fractional structures, owners can face direct exposure to unpaid fuel, maintenance, or charter costs if the operating company fails. Jet It owners were advised to review operating agreements carefully to understand potential liabilities.
Immediate Steps For Owners
Owners were urged to:
Secure physical access to aircraft where possible
Collect invoices, flight logs, and maintenance records
Preserve all communications related to canceled flights and payments
These documents are critical for filing claims and asserting ownership rights.
Greensboro, North Carolina Hangar Issue
A notable operational dispute emerged at Piedmont Triad International Airport (KGSO). The hangar issue affected airplanes across the country, complicating storage and retrieval for owners.
Hangar Lockout And Unpaid Rent
Jet reportedly owed substantial unpaid hangar rent at the Greensboro facility. As a result, aircraft access was restricted, complicating the retrieval of logbooks and equipment.
Recommended Owner Actions
Owners were advised to coordinate with the hangar landlord and legal counsel to recover aircraft records and ensure continued airworthiness compliance.
With the immediate impact on owners and clients outlined, it is important to understand the broader context of private jet travel and its benefits.
Benefits Of Private Jet Travel
Despite the challenges Jet It faced, private jet travel offers distinct advantages over commercial flying. Passengers can bypass long TSA lines, access thousands of smaller regional airports that commercial airlines cannot serve, and enjoy privacy and flexibility. Modern private jet cabins can function as mobile offices equipped with high-speed internet and quiet zones for meetings.
Understanding these benefits provides context for why fractional jet ownership programs like Jet It’s have become popular, including options such as 1/8th fractional jet ownership structures, and why their failure has significant repercussions for owners and the industry.
With the advantages of private jet travel in mind, we now turn to the specific reasons behind Jet's failure.
Why Jet It Failed
Operational Challenges
Jet’s collapse was not caused by a single event but by compounding structural weaknesses. At its peak, Jet It ranked as the 13th-largest U.S. operator based on charter and fractional flight hours in 2023, initially experiencing rapid growth in flight hours.
Jet faced significant operational challenges due to a high number of aircraft in maintenance, with over half of its fleet grounded at one point. Deferred maintenance reduced fleet availability, forcing Jet It to ground over half its fleet at one point and rely heavily on costly off-fleet charters to meet demand.
Jet It gained a reputation for being slow or delinquent on payments to maintenance providers, which delayed aircraft servicing and impacted operations. The company often canceled flights due to a lack of aircraft availability, which violated its agreements with fractional customers and disrupted flying for many clients.
Aggressive Pricing And Cash Shortfalls
Jet It offered below-market hourly rates—$1,600 per hour—significantly lower than many private jet hourly rates that can range from $1,500 to $30,000 depending on the jet type. This attractive pricing model helped drive rapid growth but also limited margins and left little buffer for disruptions, particularly given the full cost of fractional jet ownership.
Reliance On Fractional Sales And Revenue Streams
Jet’s business model relied on generating revenue from fractional-owner hourly fees, monthly maintenance fees, and off-network charter flights. Jet It allowed customers to purchase a share, granting them a set number of days to use the aircraft. However, the company’s reliance on continuous fractional sales to fund operations exposed it to liquidity shocks when sales slowed, underscoring key risks when viewing fractional jet ownership as an investment.
High Fixed Costs Of Private Jet Ownership
Owning and operating private jets involves high fixed costs, including salaries for crew and hangar fees that can reach $20,000 per month. These expenses added to Jet’s financial strain.
Supply-Chain Constraints
Industry-wide supply-chain delays limited new aircraft deliveries, further constraining growth and capacity planning.
With these operational and financial challenges in mind, it is important to examine the specific flaws in Jet's business model, including how alternatives like floating fleet options in fractional ownership can mitigate some structural risks.
Business Model Flaws
Charter-Rate Mismatch
Charter replacement flights often cost significantly more than owner hourly rates, creating a structural loss on each substituted trip.
High Off-Fleet Charter Dependence
Sustained reliance on third-party charter eroded profitability.
Overreliance On Selling Equity
The business model depended heavily on continuous sales of fractional positions rather than stable operational margins.
With these business model flaws, Jet’s customer service and operational reliability deteriorated further.
Customer Service And Operational Collapse
As financial pressure mounted:
Flight cancellations increased. The company often canceled flights due to a lack of aircraft availability, which violated its agreements with fractional customers and disrupted flying for many clients.
Vendors delayed service due to nonpayment
Aircraft were grounded under the stated rationale of safety and reliability, though cash preservation also played a role
With the operational collapse complete, stakeholders must now consider their next steps.
Next Steps For Creditors, Owners And Regulators
Creditors
Unsecured creditors should:
Owners
Owners are strongly advised to seek:
Regulators And OEMs
Engagement with the:
may be necessary to ensure aircraft compliance and support continuity.
With next steps outlined, the industry can reflect on the broader lessons from Jet's collapse.
Lessons For The Private Jet Market
The Jet It bankruptcy offers clear lessons:
Vet the financial health of fractional providers
Demand transparency around vendor payments and maintenance funding
Ensure contracts include protections for owner access, records, and aircraft control
In 2026, private jet travel is increasingly seen as a strategic business tool rather than merely a luxury, especially in Europe and other international markets, where discerning travelers evaluate the best fractional jet ownership programs alongside charter and membership options.
Final Thoughts: Choosing Stability In Fractional Jet Ownership
Jet’s Chapter 7 bankruptcy underscores that private aviation success is built on disciplined financial management, conservative pricing, and resilient operational planning. For those evaluating fractional aircraft ownership, the priority should not be headline pricing, but long-term stability, governance, and risk protection, and a clear comparison of fractional jet ownership vs membership programs.
Ready to explore the smarter way to fly private? Visit https://www.fractionaljetownership.com/ to learn how fractional ownership can be structured with transparency, reliability, and long-term value in mind.
Sign up with google
Sign up with Apple
